Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Record

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Record

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Fails WP:NCRIC - has not "played at the highest [...] domestic level". Minor counties are not the highest level, it's in the name. Also, the first round of the NatWest Trophy was clearly not the highest level of English domestic one-day cricket in 1991, there were two other leagues primarily contested by County Championship teams. This would be like describing the first round of the FA Cup as the highest level of English football. 120.16.63.71 (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since he fails both cricket notability and GNG, there is absolutely no reason to have this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely and utterly non-notable (I assume the above comment from "120.16.63.71" also can be taken as a delete). RobinCarmody (talk) 19:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.